| |
Вы не правы. Я уверен. Давайте обсудим это. Пишите мне в PM, пообщаемся. Although the USA convinced the appeals commission that these laws were required"to protect public nervous and morals, the stated protection of in the states on our grounds present was eventually rejected, because their laws regarding remote betting on horse racing, were not applied equally to European, American and Russian online betting companies, <a href=https://www.shimenandco.com/archives/20993>https://www.shimenandco.com/archives/20993</a> and other organizations. thus, the USA could not prove that their laws are non-discriminatory. |